From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. DMSI Staffing, LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 15-15366 (9th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 15-15366

02-16-2017

MARTINA HERNANDEZ, an individual, appearing individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DMSI STAFFING, LLC; ROSS STORES, INC., Defendants-Appellants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01531-EMC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 13, 2017 San Francisco, California Before: BERZON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. --------

Defendants DMSI Staffing, LLC and Ross Stores, Inc. appeal the district court's order denying their motion to compel arbitration of Martina Hernandez's representative California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act ("PAGA") claim. The Defendants argue Hernandez is bound by her agreement with her employers to arbitrate all disputes regarding her employment on an individual basis.

Under California law, "an employment agreement [that] compels the waiver of representative claims under the PAGA, [] is contrary to public policy and unenforceable." Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348, 384 (2014). The Iskanian rule is not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., 803 F.3d 425, 427 (9th Cir. 2015) ("[T]he Iskanian rule does not stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment of the FAA's objectives, and is not preempted."); see also Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-16178, 2016 WL 7470557, at *7 (9th Cir. Sept. 7, 2016). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of Defendants' motion to compel individual arbitration of Hernandez's PAGA claim.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. DMSI Staffing, LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 16, 2017
No. 15-15366 (9th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Hernandez v. DMSI Staffing, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARTINA HERNANDEZ, an individual, appearing individually and on behalf of…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

No. 15-15366 (9th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Express Scripts, Inc.

Prejudice followed bad faith there because the plaintiff's bad faith, if unaddressed, would have allowed her…