From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2014
No. ED CV 13-0230-JGB (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2014)

Opinion

No. ED CV 13-0230-JGB (DFM)

04-09-2014

EDWARD V. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, Respondent.


Order Accepting Findings and

Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

__________

JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2014
No. ED CV 13-0230-JGB (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD V. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

No. ED CV 13-0230-JGB (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2014)

Citing Cases

Hecht v. Paramo

Petitioner is not entitled to statutory tolling for the delay in the filing.") (citing, inter alia,Chaffer v.…