From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Constable

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
2:19-cv-2195 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2195 MCE DB P

07-21-2021

CESAR N. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. A. CONSTABLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF No. 62, herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 63.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, ECF No. 62, filed May 27, 2021, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the denial of a default judgment (ECF No. 61) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Constable

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
2:19-cv-2195 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Constable

Case Details

Full title:CESAR N. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. A. CONSTABLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2195 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)