From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1998
255 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 17, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. While defendant City of New York's press release admitted that the City's laboratory may have mishandled plaintiff's blood sample, this admission does not constitute a sufficient ground to conclude as a matter of law that the acts and omissions complained of were "so extreme in degree and outrageous in character as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, so as to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community" ( Naturman v. Crain Communications, 216 A.D.2d 150; see also, Ugarriza v. Schmieder, 46 N.Y.2d 471, 475).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1998
255 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Hernandez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA HERNANDEZ et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

Wolkstein v. Morgenstern

The eviction was allegedly jointly caused by the failure of her attorney to honestly inform her of the…

Wilson v. City of N.Y

It has repeatedly been held that this cause of action may only proceed where the allegations of conduct are…