From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. City of McAllen Police Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 12, 2022
MISCELLANEOUS 7:21-MC-70 (S.D. Tex. May. 12, 2022)

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS 7:21-MC-70

05-12-2022

CARLOS HERNANDEZ v. CITY OF MCALLEN POLICE DEPARTMENT


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING RELIEF, AND GRANTING DISMISSAL

Randy Crane, United States District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiff Carlos Hernandez's letter-motion requesting the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 9), and Plaintiff's objections thereto. After having reviewed the said Report and Recommendation, and after appropriate review of Plaintiff's objections thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the conclusions in said Report and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the conclusions in United States Magistrate Judge Nadia S. Medrano's Report and Recommendation entered as Docket Entry No.10 are hereby adopted by this Court.

FURTHER, the Court, having adopted the conclusions of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nadia S. Medrano, is of the opinion that the letter-motion requesting the appointment of counsel should be DENIED, and that this action should be DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Hernandez v. City of McAllen Police Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 12, 2022
MISCELLANEOUS 7:21-MC-70 (S.D. Tex. May. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Hernandez v. City of McAllen Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS HERNANDEZ v. CITY OF MCALLEN POLICE DEPARTMENT

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: May 12, 2022

Citations

MISCELLANEOUS 7:21-MC-70 (S.D. Tex. May. 12, 2022)