From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. City of Fullerton

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
8:20-CV-01747-CJC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

8:20-CV-01747-CJC-JDE

12-28-2021

HECTOR HERNANDEZ, individually, C.H. and H.R. by and through their Guardian ASHLEY CHADWICK, individually and as successor-in-interest of HECTOR HERNANDEZ, deceased,, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FULLERTON; FULLERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, public entities; CORPORAL JONATHAN FERRELL, and DOES 1 through 50, individually and as peace officers, inclusive, Defendants.


Hon. Cormac J. Carney, Dist. Judge.

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

Hon. John D. Early, Magistrate Judge.

Based on the parties' Stipulation for Entry of Protective Order re Confidential Documents and the Court's authority, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY FOUND AND ORDERED that:

1. SCOPE OF PROTECTION.

The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material/Confidential Documents (as defined below), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by the parties' Stipulation and this Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party.

The Definitions section of the parties' associated Stipulation is incorporated by reference herein.

Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the Orders of the trial judge: this Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.

Nothing in parties' Stipulation or this Order shall be construed as binding upon the Court or its court personnel, who are subject only to the Court's internal procedures regarding the handling of materials filed or lodged, including materials filed or lodged under seal.

A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS.

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting or defending this litigation would be warranted. The parties have acknowledged that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the specified information or items that are entitled to treatment as confidential.

The parties further acknowledged that this Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal, except to the extent specified herein; Central District Local Rule 79-5.1 et seq. sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal.

Nothing in the parties' Stipulation or in this Order shall be construed as any entitlement for the parties to file any documents or materials under seal; nor shall the parties' Stipulation or this Order be construed as any exemption from any of the requirements of Central District Local Rule 79-5. The parties are required to comply with the applicable Local Rules in their entirety. If the Court denies a party's request for filing material under seal, that material may be filed in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the Court.

Nothing in this Order shall be construed so as to require or mandate that any Party disclose or produce privileged information or records that could be designated as Confidential Documents/Protected Material hereunder.

2. DURATION OF PROTECTION.

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs.

Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; or (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.

3. DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL/CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS.

3.1. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under the parties' Stipulation and this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify - so that other portions of the material, documents, items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routine designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or inhibit the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Party's or a non-party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

3.2. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or as otherwise ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial proceedings, and regardless of whether produced in hardcopy or electronic form), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion that it is “CONFIDENTIAL.” The placement of such “CONFIDENTIAL” stamp on such page(s) shall not obstruct the substance of the page's (or pages') text or content.

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the Receiving Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the Receiving Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

(b) for testimony given in deposition, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, all protected testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Producing Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition is concluded) a right to have up to twenty (20) days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Protective Order.

The court reporter must affix to each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL, ” as instructed by the Producing Party.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any other tangible items (including but not limited to information produced on disc or electronic data storage device), that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying the material as “CONFIDENTIAL.”

3.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected (preferably, though not necessarily, within 30 days of production or disclosure of such material), an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items as “CONFIDENTIAL” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under the parties' Stipulation and this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the parties' Stipulation and this Order.

3.4. Alteration of Confidentiality Stamp Prohibited. A Receiving Party shall not alter, edit, or modify any Protected Material so as to conceal, obscure, or remove a “CONFIDENTIAL” stamp or legend thereon; nor shall a Receiving Party take any other action so as to make it appear that Protected Material is not subject to the terms and provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Order. However, nothing in this section shall be construed so as to prevent a Receiving Party from challenging a confidentiality designation subject to the provisions of section 4, infra.

4. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS.

4.1. Timing of Challenges. Any Party or non-party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court's Scheduling Order.

4.2. Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process under Local Rule 37-1 et seq, which shall include providing written notice of each specific designation it is challenging, and describing the basis (and supporting authority or argument) for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this Protective Order.

4.3 Joint Stipulation. Any challenge submitted to the Court shall be via a joint stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 37-2. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party's designation until the Court rules on the challenge.

4.4. Withdrawal of “CONFIDENTIAL” Designation. At its discretion, a Designating Party may remove Protected Material/Confidential Documents from some or all of the protections and provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Order at any time by any of the following methods:

(a) Express Written Withdrawal. A Designating Party may withdraw a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation made to any specified Protected Material/Confidential Documents from some or all of the protections of the parties' Stipulation and this Order by an express withdrawal in a writing signed by such Party (or such Party's Counsel, but not including staff of such Counsel) that specifies and itemizes the Disclosure or Discovery Material previously designated as Protected Material/Confidential Documents that shall no longer be subject to all or some of the provisions of the parties' Stipulation and Order. Such express withdrawal shall be effective when transmitted or served upon the Receiving Party. If a Designating Party is withdrawing Protected Material from only some of the provisions/protections of the parties' Stipulation and this Order, such Party must state which specific provisions are no longer to be enforced as to the specified material for which confidentiality protection hereunder is withdrawn. Otherwise, such withdrawal shall be construed as a withdrawal of such material from all of the protections/provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Order;

(b) Express Withdrawal on the Record. A Designating Party may withdraw a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation made to any specified Protected Material/ Confidential Documents from all of the provisions/protections of the parties' Stipulation and this Order by verbally consenting in court proceedings on the record to such withdrawal - provided that such withdrawal specifies the Disclosure or Discovery Material previously designated as Protected Material/Confidential Documents that shall no longer be subject to any of the provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Order. A Designating Party is not permitted to withdraw Protected Material from only some of the protections/ provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Order by this method;

(c) Implicit Withdrawal by Publication or Failure to Oppose Challenge. A Designating Party shall be construed to have withdrawn a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation made to any specified Protected Material/Confidential Documents from all of the provisions/protections of the parties' Stipulation and this Order by either (1) making such Protected Material/Confidential Records part of the public record - including but not limited to attaching such as exhibits to any filing with the Court without moving, prior to such filing, for the Court to seal such records; or (2) failing to timely oppose a Challenging Party's motion to remove a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation to specified Protected Material/Confidential Documents.

Nothing in the parties' Stipulation and this Order shall be construed so as to require any Party to file Protected Material/Confidential Documents under seal, unless expressly specified herein.

5. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL.

5.1. Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for preparing, prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation - up to and including final disposition of the above-entitled action - and not for any other purpose, including any other litigation or dispute outside the scope of this action.

Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in the parties' Stipulation and this Order. When the above entitled litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 9, below (FINAL DISPOSITION).

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under the parties' Stipulation and its Order.

5.2. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "CONFIDENTIAL" only to:

(a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of such Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation - each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by the parties' Stipulation and this Order;

(c) Experts (as defined in the parties' Stipulation) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation - each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by the parties' Stipulation and this Order;

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation - each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by the parties' Stipulation and this Order;

(e) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary - each of whom, by accepting receipt of such Protected Material, thereby agree to be bound by the parties' Stipulation and this Order. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under the parties' Stipulation and this Protective Order;

(f) the author or custodian of a document containing the information that constitutes Protected Material, or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

5.3. Notice of Confidentiality. Prior to producing or disclosing Protected Material/Confidential Documents to persons to whom the parties' Stipulation and this Order permits disclosure or production (see section 5.2, supra), a Receiving Party shall provide a copy of this Order to such persons so as to put such persons on notice as to the restrictions imposed upon them herein: except that, for court reporters, Professional Vendors, and for witnesses being provided with Protected Material during a deposition, it shall be sufficient notice for Counsel to give the witness a verbal admonition (on the record, for witnesses) regarding the provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Order and such provisions' applicability to specified Protected Material at issue.

5.4. Reservation of Rights. Nothing in the parties' Stipulation and this Order shall be construed so as to require any Producing Party to designate any records or materials as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Nothing in the parties' Stipulation or this Order shall be construed so as to prevent the admission of Protected Material into evidence at the trial of this action, or in any appellate proceedings for this action, solely on the basis that such Disclosure or Discovery Material has been designated as Protected Material/Confidential Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in the parties' Stipulation or this Order shall be construed as a waiver of any privileges or of any rights to object to the use or admission into evidence of any Protected Material in any proceeding; nor shall anything herein be construed as a concession that any privileges asserted or objections made are valid or applicable.

Nothing in the parties' Stipulation or this Order shall be construed so as to prevent the Designating Party (or its Counsel or custodian of records) from having access to and using Protected Material designated by that Party in the manner in which such persons or entities would typically use such materials in the normal course of their duties or profession - except that the waiver of confidentiality provisions shall apply (see section 4.4(c), supra).

5.5. Applications to File Confidential Documents Under Seal. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5.1, et seq., which contains detailed procedures governing the procedures for requests to file material under seal. The parties agree that, barring withdrawal of a designation or some other reason excusing such attempt provided in this Order or as agreed by the parties, any party who receives Protected Material designated under this Order by another Party will follow the procedures under Local Civil Rule 79-5.1 et seq. to seek leave to file such material under seal. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material. If a Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court.

6. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION.

If a Party is served with a subpoena or court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items in the Party's possession or control which had been designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL, ” that Party must:

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party, preferably (though not necessarily) by facsimile or electronic mail. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order at issue, if possible;

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to the parties' Stipulation and this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a specific reference to the parties' Stipulation and this Protective Order; and

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by all sides in any such situation, while adhering to the terms of the parties' Stipulation and this Order.

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party's permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material - and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

The purpose of this section is to ensure that the affected Party has a meaningful opportunity to preserve its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or court order issued.

7. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL.

7.1. Unauthorized Disclosure of Protected Material.

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under the parties' Stipulation and this Order, the Receiving Party must:

(a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures;
(b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material;
(c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order; and
(d) request that such person or persons consent to be bound by the Stipulation and this Order.

7.2. Inadvertent Production of Privileged or Otherwise Protected Material.

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted to the Court.

8. PUBLICATION OF PROTECTED MATERIAL PROHIBITED.

A Receiving Party shall not publish, release, post, or disseminate Protected Material to any person except those delineated and authorized by the parties' Stipulation and this Order (see section 5, supra); nor shall a Receiving Party publish, release, leak, post, or disseminate Protected Material/Confidential Documents to any news media, member of the press, website, or public forum (except as permitted under this Order regarding filings with the Court in this action and under seal).

9. FINAL DISPOSITION.

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within thirty (30) days after the final termination of this action (defined as the dismissal or entry of judgment by the above named Court, or if an appeal is filed, the disposition of the appeal), upon written request by the Producing Party, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party - whether retained by the Receiving Party or its Counsel, Experts, Professional Vendors, agents, or any non-party to whom the Receiving Party produced or shared such records or information.

As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material, regardless of the medium (hardcopy, electronic, or otherwise) in which such Protected Material is stored or retained.

In the alternative, at the discretion of the Receiving Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it - unless such Protected Material is an original, in which case, the Receiving Party must obtain the Producing Party's written consent before destroying such original Protected Material.

Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) within thirty (30) days of the aforementioned written request by the Designating Party that specifically identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected material (in any medium, including but not limited to any hardcopy, electronic or digital copy, or otherwise).

Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda or other documents filed with the Court in this action, as well as any correspondence or attorney work product prepared by Counsel for the Receiving Party, even if such materials contain Protected Material; however, any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 2, above. This Court shall retain jurisdiction in the event that a Designating Party elects to seek enforcement of this Order, including sanctions for violation of the parties' Stipulation and this Order. 10. MISCELLANEOUS.

10.1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in the parties' Stipulation or this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

10.2. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in the parties' Stipulation or this Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence any of the material covered by the parties' Stipulation and this Protective Order.

The provisions of the parties' Stipulation and this Protective Order shall be in effect until further Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. City of Fullerton

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
8:20-CV-01747-CJC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. City of Fullerton

Case Details

Full title:HECTOR HERNANDEZ, individually, C.H. and H.R. by and through their…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

8:20-CV-01747-CJC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)