From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Staff

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Nov 17, 2006
Case No. 2:06-cv-608-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:06-cv-608-FtM-29SPC.

November 17, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon review of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. #1), filed November 6, 2006, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, which was subsequently transferred to this Court. Petitioner alleges that an officer from Charlotte Correctional Institution ("CCI") racially discriminated against Petitioner by issuing him a false disciplinary report. Petitioner seeks mandamus relief, requesting that the Court direct CCI to: follow specific sections of the rules established by the Florida Department of Corrections, abide by Florida law, reverse the disciplinary action, and restore Petitioner's jail record. (Doc. #1

Writs of mandamus have been abolished in federal practice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(b), although United States District Courts have jurisdiction in actions in the nature of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361. While federal courts have jurisdiction over mandamus actions that seek to compel a federal official to perform a specific duty, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, federal courts have no general power to compel performance by a state official, or a private corporation in privity of contract with a state agency, where mandamus is the only relief sought.Russell v. Knight, 488 F.2d 96, 97 (5th Cir. 1973); Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior Court, 474 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1973); Lamar v. 118th Judicial District Court of Texas, 440 F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1971). Here, Petitioner requests that the Court compel performance by a state correctional facility. Further, to the extent Petitioner claims violations of his constitutional rights, Petitioner may initiate a new action by filing a civil rights complaint form pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. #1) is DENIED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall: (1) terminate any pending motions; (2) enter judgment accordingly; (3) close this case.

3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to send Petitioner a civil rights Complaint form.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Staff

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Nov 17, 2006
Case No. 2:06-cv-608-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Staff

Case Details

Full title:Peter Hernandez, Petitioner, v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Staff…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Nov 17, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:06-cv-608-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2006)

Citing Cases

Goldwire v. Sec'y Fla. Dep't of Corr.

The District Court, therefore, lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See Brown v. Lewis, 361 Fed.Appx. 51, 56…

Ford v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Although federal courts "may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective…