From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Carcamo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 16, 2021
21 Civ. 9033 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9033 (AT)

11-16-2021

NELSON HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. RAUL ALFREDO SANTANA CARCAMO and MALIK HARTFIELD Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive detennination of evexy action and proceeding," Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is fmiher ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Carcamo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 16, 2021
21 Civ. 9033 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Carcamo

Case Details

Full title:NELSON HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. RAUL ALFREDO SANTANA CARCAMO and MALIK…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 9033 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2021)