From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Bishara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2016
Case No. CV 15-8556-RGK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-8556-RGK (KK)

08-30-2016

JUANITA HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISHAK BISHARA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Amended Report and Recommendation, and all relevant records. The Court accepts the amended findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Court warns Plaintiffs Juanita Hernandez and Cerros Hernandez, aka J. Lydia Hernandez and Eutimio Hernandez, they must comply with the vexatious litigant order issued in Lydia Hernandez v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, 2:14-cv-04432-R-SH (C.D. Cal. filed Jun. 9, 2014). Plaintiffs Juanita Hernandez and Cerros Hernandez, aka J. Lydia Hernandez and Eutimio Hernandez, may not seek to evade the vexatious litigant order by using pseudonyms or aliases. The Clerk of Court has noted the pseudonyms and aliases used in this case. Dated: August 30, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Bishara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2016
Case No. CV 15-8556-RGK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Bishara

Case Details

Full title:JUANITA HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISHAK BISHARA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-8556-RGK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2016)