From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. 767 Fifth Partners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 27, 2021
194 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13926 Index No. 104645/11 90360/12 Case No. 2019-04356

05-27-2021

Tommy HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. 767 FIFTH PARTNERS, LLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents. 767 Fifth Partners, LLC, et al., Third–Party Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. J.P. Phillips, Inc., Third–Party Defendant–Appellant. Plaza Construction LLC formerly known as Plaza Construction Corp., Second Third–Party Plaintiff–Respondent, v. J.P. Phillips, Inc., Second Third–Party Defendant–Appellant.

Hardin Kundla McKeon & Poletto P.A., New York (Wayne A. Williams of counsel), for appellant.


Hardin Kundla McKeon & Poletto P.A., New York (Wayne A. Williams of counsel), for appellant.

Kapnick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moulton, Mendez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered August 6, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff established prima facie entitlement to partial summary judgment by his testimony that he was injured when the plywood platform of a baker's scaffold upon which he was standing to install window soffits suddenly collapsed beneath him as he reached overhead to drill a screw into a stud (see Kind v. 1177 Ave. of the Ams. Acquisitions, LLC, 168 A.D.3d 408, 91 N.Y.S.3d 394 [1st Dept. 2019] ).

Third-party defendant/second third-party defendant J.P. Phillips, Inc. (Phillips), plaintiff's employer, failed to raise a triable issue that plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his accident. Phillips did not submit proof establishing that the scaffold was an adequate safety device for the work plaintiff was performing at the time of his accident (see Auriemma v. Biltmore Theatre, LLC, 82 A.D.3d 1, 10, 917 N.Y.S.2d 130 [1st Dept. 2011] ). That plaintiff might have been comparatively negligent by allegedly failing to abide by safety instructions, including self-inspecting the scaffold prior to its use, and by attempting to move the scaffold to a different location while standing atop it, does not preclude partial summary judgment in this instance, particularly since Phillips's foreman knew its workers would move scaffolds in that manner (see Hoffman v. SJP TS, LLC, 111 A.D.3d 467, 974 N.Y.S.2d 450 [1st Dept. 2013] ).


Summaries of

Hernandez v. 767 Fifth Partners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 27, 2021
194 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. 767 Fifth Partners

Case Details

Full title:Tommy Hernandez, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 767 Fifth Partners, LLC, et al…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 27, 2021

Citations

194 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 3378
144 N.Y.S.3d 559

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. 767 Fifth Partners, LLC

Before: Renwick, J.P., González, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. Order, Supreme Court, New York County…

Hernandez v. 767 Fifth Partners, LLC

Renwick, J.P., Gonza´lez, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A.…