From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. 601 W. Assocs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2019
172 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9352 Index 301487/14

05-21-2019

Oscar HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent, v. 601 WEST ASSOCIATES, Defendant–Respondent–Appellant.

Gorayeb & Associates, P.C., New York (John M. Shaw of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Armienti, DeBellis, Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP, New York (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for respondent-appellant.


Gorayeb & Associates, P.C., New York (John M. Shaw of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Armienti, DeBellis, Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP, New York (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Manzanet–Daniels, Webber, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered on or about April 23, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240(1) claim and the Labor Law § 241(6) claim predicated on Industrial Code ( 12 NYCRR) § 23–6.1(d), and denied plaintiff's motion to the extent it sought summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim and granted the motion to the extent it sought to amend the bill of particulars to allege a violation of 12 NYCRR 23–6.1(d), unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendant's motion, and to deny plaintiff's motion to amend, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries he sustained when a refrigerator he was pushing up the stairs from the basement of a restaurant fell on him after the rope that tied the refrigerator to a hand-truck being pulled up by another individual broke. Notwithstanding the work being performed in other parts of the premises, and contrary to his own characterization of his work as demolition, plaintiff, whose task was to remove debris and garbage, including the refrigerator, from the basement, was not engaged in an activity protected by Labor Law § 240(1) or 241(6) at the time of his accident (see generally Martinez v. City of New York, 93 N.Y.2d 322, 326, 690 N.Y.S.2d 524, 712 N.E.2d 689 [1999] ; Toro v. Plaza Constr. Corp., 82 A.D.3d 505, 919 N.Y.S.2d 146 [1st Dept. 2011], lv denied 18 N.Y.3d 801, 2011 WL 6155556 [2011] ).


Summaries of

Hernandez v. 601 W. Assocs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2019
172 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Hernandez v. 601 W. Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:Oscar Hernandez, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. 601 West Associates…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 21, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
98 N.Y.S.3d 744
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3911

Citing Cases

Barron v. The City of New York

For the same reasons, plaintiff's work for Trent on the project does not constitute construction, excavation…