From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez-Muniz v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Jul 28, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. B-09-143, (CRIMINAL NO. B-08-455-1) (S.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. B-09-143, (CRIMINAL NO. B-08-455-1).

July 28, 2009


ORDER


Pending is the Magistrate Judge's June 17, 2009, Report and Recommendation in the above-referenced cause of action. [Docket No. 4] No objections have been lodged by either side and the time for doing so has expired. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation for plain error and having found none, it is the opinion of the Court that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED, that Mr. Hernandez-Muniz' Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence [Docket No. 1] is DENIED and the case is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Hernandez-Muniz v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Jul 28, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. B-09-143, (CRIMINAL NO. B-08-455-1) (S.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Hernandez-Muniz v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE SANTOS HERNANDEZ-MUNIZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division

Date published: Jul 28, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. B-09-143, (CRIMINAL NO. B-08-455-1) (S.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ordones v. United States

"In such a situation, the defendant's § 2255 motion should be dismissed without prejudice to refiling after…

Melo-Cedano v. United States

"In such a situation, the defendant's § 2255 motion should be dismissed without prejudice to refiling after…