Courts have generally declined to allow hybrid civil rights and habeas actions to proceed, given that civil rights actions and habeas petitions have distinct purposes and contain unique procedural requirements that make a hybrid action difficult to manage. See Gillespie v. Olmstead, No. 1:23-cv-1289, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13230, at *7-8 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2024) (collecting cases); Davis v. Washington, No. 2:21-cv-129, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52329, at *9 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 23, 2022) (same); Glaze v. Morgan, No. 1:19-CV-02974-JRK, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176800, at *5-6 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 10, 2021) (same); Hernandez-Morales v. Sec'y, Dep't of Homeland Sec., No. 1:18-cv-505, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91621, at *4-5 (S.D. Ohio May 31, 2019) (same). Accordingly, Weiss must file a separate civil action if he wishes to pursue declaratory relief.