From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hermele v. Union Free School District No. 23

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

By demanding money damages, the plaintiff sought resolution of a private dispute and not the vindication of an important public right. Accordingly, the "public interest exception" to the notice requirement of Education Law § 3813 was inapplicable and the Supreme Court properly dismissed those causes of action which sought to recover damages based upon the plaintiff's admitted failure to comply with the notice requirement (see, 423 S. Salina St. v. City of Syracuse, 68 N.Y.2d 474, 493, cert. denied 481 U.S. 1008; Mills v. County of Monroe, 59 N.Y.2d 307, cert. denied 464 U.S. 1018; Matter of Vail v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 115 A.D.2d 231). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hermele v. Union Free School District No. 23

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Hermele v. Union Free School District No. 23

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS S. HERMELE, Appellant, v. UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23 et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 185

Citing Cases

Zoll v. Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.

self and other winning bettors, seeks to recover from OTB the difference between what was paid out to winning…

White v. Freyman

This is especially so in light of more recent cases that have applied the section 3813 notice requirement to…