From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herman v. The Mr. Cooper Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 4, 2024
2:23-cv-948-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-948-JES-KCD

06-04-2024

KATHLEEN HERMAN and JEFFREY GHIAZZA, Plaintiffs, v. THE MR. COOPER GROUP INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel, For Sanctions, and For Default Judgment. (Doc. 80.) The Court denies the motion without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). The Court cannot overstate the importance of Local Rule 3.01(g) in helping avoid needless litigation, fostering communication between the parties, and helping to resolve disputes without court intervention. For any future motions, Plaintiffs must confer with opposing counsel and denote their position with respect to the relief sought. Any renewed motion must indicate in its Rule 3.01(g) certification the manner of conferral and any agreements reached.

ORDERED


Summaries of

Herman v. The Mr. Cooper Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 4, 2024
2:23-cv-948-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Herman v. The Mr. Cooper Grp.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN HERMAN and JEFFREY GHIAZZA, Plaintiffs, v. THE MR. COOPER GROUP…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jun 4, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-948-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2024)