From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herman v. Herman

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 12, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7161 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

No. 137 SSM 16

10-12-2017

Rosemarie A. Herman, & c., et al., Respondents, Avon Bard LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Julian Maurice Herman, et al., Appellants, Michael Offit, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted by John Siegal, for appellants. Submitted by Natasha Shishov, for respondents.


Submitted by John Siegal, for appellants.

Submitted by Natasha Shishov, for respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding defendant Julian Maurice Herman from participating in the inquest to assess damages against him. Moreover, the denial of that defendant's cross motion was proper. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.

Decided October 12, 2017


Summaries of

Herman v. Herman

Court of Appeals of New York
Oct 12, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7161 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Herman v. Herman

Case Details

Full title:Rosemarie A. Herman, & c., et al., Respondents, Avon Bard LLC, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Oct 12, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7161 (N.Y. 2017)