From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heredink v. Holton

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1860
16 Cal. 103 (Cal. 1860)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Eleventh District.

         Suit to recover a half share, or an undivided sixteenth of the capital stock of the " El Dorado Canal Company," whose property consisted of a water ditch. Defendants had judgment. Plaintiffs appeal.

         Judgment reversed and case remanded, that the Court may find the facts. Ordered accordingly.

         COUNSEL

          Newell & Williams, for Appellants.

          Sanderson & Hewes, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: At the April term, 1859, a decision was rendered affirming the judgment below. A rehearing having been granted, the following opinion was delivered by Baldwin, J. Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

         OPINION

         BALDWIN, Judge

         On reargument, the facts are not found in the case, but only statements given of what witnesses testified as to several matters necessary to the correct determination of the issues involved. The Court below should find the facts--not merely state the proofs.

         Judgment reversed and case remanded, that the Court may find the facts. Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Heredink v. Holton

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1860
16 Cal. 103 (Cal. 1860)
Case details for

Heredink v. Holton

Case Details

Full title:HEREDINK et al. v. HOLTON et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1860

Citations

16 Cal. 103 (Cal. 1860)

Citing Cases

Hihn v. Peck

" And the judgment was reversed accordingly.          In Davis v. Caldwell, 12 Cal. 125, and in Heredink v.…