From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herbin v. Stolz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 16, 2017
63 N.Y.S.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-16-2017

In re Reginald HERBIN, Petitioner, v. Hon. Robert STOLZ, et al., Respondents.

Reginald Herbin, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Robert Stolz and Hon. Jill Konviser, respondents. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ross D. Mazer of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Michael Mulanphy, respondents.


Reginald Herbin, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Robert Stolz and Hon. Jill Konviser, respondents.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ross D. Mazer of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Michael Mulanphy, respondents.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

RENWICK, J.P., MANZANET–DANIELS, ANDRIAS, KERN, OING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herbin v. Stolz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 16, 2017
63 N.Y.S.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Herbin v. Stolz

Case Details

Full title:In re Reginald HERBIN, Petitioner, v. Hon. Robert STOLZ, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 16, 2017

Citations

63 N.Y.S.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)