From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herbert v. Vaughan

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 638 (N.C. 1793)

Opinion

(1793.)


In the court of Montgomery, seventeen persons were indicted for murder, in a quarrel between Herbert and Vaughan, and they were imprisoned. They were persons of such power and influence in the country that a jury could not be got to try them; whereupon Master Littleton moved for a certiorari to have them tried in Shropshire, and alleged precedents in like cases. The court granted a certiorari, and the indictments being removed in the King's Bench, at Trinity term, he moved for an habeas corpora to remove their bodies also, which was granted. And at Michaelmas term afterwards the prisoners were bailed, although they were indicted for murder, which is contrary to the statute; which it was held is capable of a favorable construction at the discretion of the Judges, as in this case, because the prisoners were in danger of starving in gaol, and the trial could not be had soon. Pp. 118 and 166.


Summaries of

Herbert v. Vaughan

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 638 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for

Herbert v. Vaughan

Case Details

Full title:*HERBERT v. VAUGHAN. — Hill. 1 Car

Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports

Date published: Jan 1, 1793

Citations

1 N.C. 638 (N.C. 1793)

Citing Cases

Titan Oil Gas, Inc. v. Shipley

On the other hand, it is reversible error to transfer a case brought in equity to the law court, if equity…

Ponder v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.

As we understand the argument, it is briefly this: the "remedy" by garnishment or sequestration has been…