Herbert v. Baker

Full title: YOLANDE MARIE HERBERT, Plaintiff, v. DANNIE RAY BAKER, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 4, 2009

Case No. 09-12314 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 09-12314.

September 4, 2009

ORDER

MICHAEL HLUCHANIUK, Magistrate Judge

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deposition of Attorney Kellie Howard-Goudy shall go forward. The Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(b)(3)(A) in having the deposition conducted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Kellie Howard-Goudy owns a valid work product privilege regarding her mental impressions, conclusions, opinions and legal theories.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff owns "fact" work product and it is appropriate for Plaintiff's counsel to ask questions of the deponent regarding the facts surrounding the stipulation and order of dismissal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deposition of Attorney Kellie Howard-Goudy take place at a neutral site agreed upon between the parties.