From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hepting v. AT&T Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 21, 2008
539 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 06-17132, 06-17137.

August 21, 2008.

Cindy A. Cohn, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Elena Maria Dimuzio, Robert D. Fram, Heller Ehrman, LLP, Eric B. Fastiff, Lieff Cabraser Heimann Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeff D. Friedman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Tze Lee Tien, Berkeley, CA, Eric A. Isaacson, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman Robbins, LLP, San Diego, CA, James Samuel Tyre, Culver City, CA, Bert Voorhees, Traber, Voorhees Olguin, Pasadena, CA, for Tash Hepting, Gregory Hicks, Erik Knutzen, Carolyn Jewel.

Barry R. Himmelstein, Lieff Cabraser Heimann Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Benson B. Roe.

Timothy L. Alger, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver Hedges LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Intervenors.

Bradford A. Berenson, David Lawson, Sidley Austin, LLP, Michael K. Kellogg, Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans, PLLC, Washington, DC, David W. Carpenter, Sidley Austin, LLP, Chicago, IL, Bruce A. Ericson, Kevin M. Fong, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.

Thomas M. Bondy, Anthony J. Coppolino, Douglas N. Letter, Andrew H. Tannenbaum, Anthony A. Yang, Gregory G. Garre, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Intervenor.

D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW, Northern District of California, San Francisco.

Before: HARRY PREGERSON, HAWKINS, and M. MARGARET McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals.


Summaries of

Hepting v. AT&T Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 21, 2008
539 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Hepting v. AT&T Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Tash HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 21, 2008

Citations

539 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Banks v. Opat

Based on that allegation, § 2511(2)(a)(ii) does not apply. See Hepting v. AT & T Corp., 439 F. Supp. 2d 974,…