From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heon v. RI Attorney Gen.'s Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Aug 7, 2012
CA 12-44 ML (D.R.I. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CA 12-44 ML

08-07-2012

FREDERICK M. HEON, JR. v. RI ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and ASHBELT. WALL


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's objection to the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Martin on July 25, 2012. Although this Court appreciates Petitioner's frustration with the length of time it has taken for him to secure a hearing on the merits of his claim in the Rhode Island Superior Court, this Court is also mindful of the requirement of respecting comity between the federal and state court systems. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation with one minor exception. At page 16 of the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Martin writes that he would recommend the issuance of a conditional order requiring the state supreme court rule on Petitioner's PCR claims within 90 days. This Court would have ordered the State to prosecute the appeal within 90 days. See Simmons v. Reynolds. 898 F.2d 865, 869 (2nd Cir. 1990).

The petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED:

______________________

Mary M. Lisi

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Heon v. RI Attorney Gen.'s Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Aug 7, 2012
CA 12-44 ML (D.R.I. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Heon v. RI Attorney Gen.'s Office

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK M. HEON, JR. v. RI ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and ASHBELT. WALL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

CA 12-44 ML (D.R.I. Aug. 7, 2012)