From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HENTZEN COATINGS, INC. v. UTI U.S., INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Mar 10, 2008
Case No. 06C0568 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 06C0568.

March 10, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff Hentzen Coatings, Inc., brought this action against several defendants alleging negligence and violations of the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706, and centering on defendants' participation in the shipment of equipment purchased by plaintiff. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on March 23, 2007, which named Atlantic Logistics Services ("ALS") as one of the defendants. To date, ALS has not appeared in this action in any manner.

Plaintiff has moved for default judgment against defendant ALS pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55. However, plaintiff failed to request that the clerk enter default under Rule 55(a). Prior to obtaining a default judgment under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a). Elements of a default must be shown by means of an affidavit or by other competent proof. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Thus, I will deny plaintiff's motion for default judgment without prejudice.

Plaintiff also moved for default judgment against defendant Charpentier Associates, Inc., but subsequently filed a stipulation voluntarily dismissing Charpentier from the action. Thus, the motion for default judgment as applied to Charpentier is moot.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

HENTZEN COATINGS, INC. v. UTI U.S., INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Mar 10, 2008
Case No. 06C0568 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 10, 2008)
Case details for

HENTZEN COATINGS, INC. v. UTI U.S., INC.

Case Details

Full title:HENTZEN COATINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UTI UNITED STATES, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 10, 2008

Citations

Case No. 06C0568 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 10, 2008)