From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hentz v. Snake River Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 29, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-01651-MC (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-01651-MC

04-29-2020

LEUMAL FRED HENTZ, Plaintiff, v. SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER :

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and alleged various violations of his federal constitutional rights. Defendants move for dismissal of plaintiff's Fifth Cause of Action against SRCI on grounds of Eleventh Amendment immunity. The motion is GRANTED.

Under § 1983, plaintiff can sue only "persons," and SRCI is not a person. Moreover, SRCI is an arm of the State, and it is immune from suit under § 1983 in federal court. See Will v. Mich. Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 66 (1989); Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 97-100 (1984). In response to defendants' motion, plaintiff invokes the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. However, plaintiff does not assert claims against SRCI under either Act, and his allegations do not support claims for disability discrimination. See Compl. at 37-38 (ECF No. 2).

CONCLUSION

Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's Fifth Cause of Action against SRCI is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of April, 2020.

s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hentz v. Snake River Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 29, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-01651-MC (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Hentz v. Snake River Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:LEUMAL FRED HENTZ, Plaintiff, v. SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-01651-MC (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2020)