From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hentschel v. Rockingham Cnty. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dec 9, 2015
Case No. 15-cv-215-SM (D.N.H. Dec. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 15-cv-215-SM

12-09-2015

Derrick Hentschel v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections

cc: Derrick Hentschel, pro se


ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated November 20, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

Plaintiff's federal and state law claims alleging a denial of adequate medical care for his knee are hereby dismiss without prejudice to plaintiff's ability to litigate his state law claims in state court.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge Date: December 9, 2015 cc: Derrick Hentschel, pro se


Summaries of

Hentschel v. Rockingham Cnty. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dec 9, 2015
Case No. 15-cv-215-SM (D.N.H. Dec. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Hentschel v. Rockingham Cnty. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Derrick Hentschel v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

Case No. 15-cv-215-SM (D.N.H. Dec. 9, 2015)