Opinion
No. 69109
12-18-2015
MICHAEL E. HENSLEY, Petitioner, v. ADAM P. LAXALT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
cc: Michael E. Hensley Attorney General/Carson City
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order directing that he be considered for parole pursuant to the legislative changes set forth in A.B. 267. See A.B. 267, 78th Leg. (Nev. 2015). We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. This issue should be presented to the district court in the first instance where a factual record may be made. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Michael E. Hensley
Attorney General/Carson City