From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hensley v. Lafler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 22, 2012
Case No. 1:09-cv-937 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-937

10-22-2012

RICHARD DEAN HENSLEY Petitioner, v. BLAINE C. LAFLER, Respondent.


HON. JANET T. NEFF


FINAL ORDER

This is a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on September 26, 2012 (Dkt 33), recommending that this Court deny the petition. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Court issues this Final Order [See RULES GOVERNING § 2254 CASES, Rule 11 (referring to the order disposing of a habeas petition as a "final order").]

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 33) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court and the petition for habeas corpus relief (Dkt 1) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) is DENIED as to each issue asserted. See RULES GOVERNING § 2254 CASES, Rule 11 (requiring the district court to "issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order"). Petitioner has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Court's rulings debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Murphy v. Ohio, 263 F.3d 466, 466-67 (6th Cir. 2001).

_________________

JANET T. NEFF

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hensley v. Lafler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 22, 2012
Case No. 1:09-cv-937 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Hensley v. Lafler

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DEAN HENSLEY Petitioner, v. BLAINE C. LAFLER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 22, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-937 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Maurizio

Moreover, there is no requirement that an expert must have interviewed the alleged victims before testifying…

Thompson v. Bauman

therefore, even though § 768.27a might seem to fall within Justice Chase's description, use of the statute…