From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hensen v. Marrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 5, 2000

February 17, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated January 26, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 Ins.(d).

Shafter Shafter, Garden City, N.Y. (Allan D. Shafter of counsel), for appellant.

Ronan, McDonnell Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (Stephen J. Donnelly of counsel), for respondents.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

In opposition to the defendants' prima facie case of entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff came forward with sufficient admissible evidence to create an issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning ofInsurance Law § 5102 Ins.(d) (see, Pietrocola v. Battibulli, 238 A.D.2d 864).


Summaries of

Hensen v. Marrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Hensen v. Marrow

Case Details

Full title:MARC L. HENSEN, appellant, v. DAVID MARROW, et al., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 901