From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. U.S. Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 2, 2015
CASE NO. 8:15-CIV-2338-T-EAK-TGW (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:15-CIV-2338-T-EAK-TGW

11-02-2015

EVA HENRY, Plaintiff. v. U.S. BANK, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R&R) issued by Magistrate Judge Thorns G. Wilson on October 13, 2015 (Doc. 5). The magistrate judge recommended that the Court dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action with leave to amend.

Pursuant to Rule 6.02, Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the parties had fourteen (14) days after service to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, or be barred from attacking the factual findings on appeal. No timely objections to the report and recommendation were filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz , 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia , 896 f.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines , Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the report and recommendation (Doc. 6) be adopted and incorporated by reference; the cause of action is dismissed for failure to state a cause of action, and the Plaintiff have up to and including December 2, 2015 to file an amended complaint that will correct the deficiencies in the initiall complaint. Failure to do so will result in dismissal this case without further notice.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 2nd day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH

United States District Judge
Copies to: All parties and counsel of record


Summaries of

Henry v. U.S. Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 2, 2015
CASE NO. 8:15-CIV-2338-T-EAK-TGW (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Henry v. U.S. Bank

Case Details

Full title:EVA HENRY, Plaintiff. v. U.S. BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 2, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 8:15-CIV-2338-T-EAK-TGW (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2015)