From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Universal Technical Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Apr 5, 2012
CV 11-01773-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Apr. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CV 11-01773-PHX-FJM

04-05-2012

Tami E. Henry, Plaintiff, v. Universal Technical Institute et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The court has before it plaintiff's motion for default judgment (doc. 88). Plaintiff moved for default judgment on April 4, 2012 pursuant to Rule 55(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. No default has been entered by the Clerk under Rule 55(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff alleges that defendants were served on March 20, 2012. Defendants must answer a complaint within twenty-one days after being served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiff's motion is premature.

IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's motion for default judgment (doc. 88). We urge plaintiff to seek the advice of a lawyer. A review of the docket strongly suggests that plaintiff will not be able to navigate this litigation on his own. If he does not have a lawyer, he may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of the Maricopa County Bar Association at 602-257-4434.

_____________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Henry v. Universal Technical Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Apr 5, 2012
CV 11-01773-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Apr. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Henry v. Universal Technical Inst.

Case Details

Full title:Tami E. Henry, Plaintiff, v. Universal Technical Institute et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Apr 5, 2012

Citations

CV 11-01773-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Apr. 5, 2012)