Henry v. Musgrave

2 Citing cases

  1. Henry v. Musgrave

    113 W. Va. 448 (W. Va. 1933)   Cited 1 times

    HATCHER, JUDGE: This is a continuation of the suit of Henry, Adm'r. v. Musgrave et al., reported in 110 W. Va. 467, 158 S.E. 783, which see for details of the litigation. Suffice it to say now, this is a creditors' suit to sell real estate in the possession of a life tenant to pay the debts of the former owner (deceased).

  2. Queen v. Caldwell

    112 W. Va. 215 (W. Va. 1932)

    A bill containing allegations affecting the interests of infants cannot be taken for confessed as to them or their guardian ad litem." Henry v. Musgrave, 110 W. Va. 467, 158 S.E. 783. In the Henry case, just cited, it was held to be error to take evidence in a chancery cause affecting property rights of infants without proper notice to their guardian ad litem of the time and place of the taking of such evidence.