Opinion
22-12830
02-27-2024
ARNOLD HENRY, Plaintiff, v. K. MIHM, UNKNOWN SCHAFFER, and JOHN DOE, Defendants.
Elizabeth A. Stafford Magistrate Judge
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the Court is the report issued on January 26, 2024 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) recommending that the Court grant in part the defendants' motion to dismiss, dismiss the plaintiffs equal protection claim, and deny the plaintiffs motions for summary judgment. The deadline for filing objections to the report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 48) is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED IN PART, and the plaintiffs claim for violation of his rights under the Equal Protection Clause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The defendants' motion is DENIED in all other respects.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment (ECF No. 28, 30) are DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the referral of the case to the assigned magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings is CONTINUED.