From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Marcelin

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2024
Civil Action 24-1891 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-1891

09-25-2024

LAKISHA HENRY, Plaintiff, v. EDRAS MARCELIN & LYFT, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

HON. JOSE RAUL ARTEAGA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Lyft Inc.'s Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF 29), Plaintiff Lakisha Henry's re-docketed Response (ECF 35) and Lyft's Reply (ECF 33), and consistent with the accompanying Memorandum of Law it is ORDERED that Lyft's Motion is GRANTED and Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend if Henry can allege sufficient facts to state a claim for negligent hiring, retention, training, supervision, and/or entrustment. Henry shall file her Amended Complaint, if any, or a notice of her intention to stand on the remaining claims in her Complaint on or before October 9, 2024.


Summaries of

Henry v. Marcelin

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2024
Civil Action 24-1891 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Henry v. Marcelin

Case Details

Full title:LAKISHA HENRY, Plaintiff, v. EDRAS MARCELIN & LYFT, INC., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-1891 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)