Opinion
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-34-RS-GRJ
04-29-2013
ORDER
Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42) and Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 43). I have reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims in the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) against Defendants Peacock and Gordon are DISMISSED and Plaintiff's Conspiracy claim against Defendant Lipford is DISMISSED.
3. The motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages and request for a judgment against the Department of Corrections is GRANTED without prejudice to Plaintiff later raising a claim for compensatory damages if he is able to demonstrate physical injury that is not de minimus.
4. The Eighth Amendment excessive force and retaliation claims against Officer Lipford remain.
____________________
RICHARD SMOAK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE