From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Isaac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 17, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The proposed intervenors, the Coalition of Institutionalized Aged and Disabled, Inc., and Friends and Relatives of Institutionalized Aged, Inc., moved to intervene in this action both in their own right and in a representative capacity on behalf of the residents of the defendant New Whitman Home for Adults. The Supreme Court denied the motion, concluding that the proposed intervenors lack standing. On appeal, the proposed intervenors do not challenge the court's conclusion that they failed to demonstrate any injury in fact and therefore lack standing to sue in their own right. They contend, however, that they should be permitted to intervene on behalf of the residents of the adult home.

To establish standing in a representative capacity, an organization must be asserting the rights of at least one of its members and not attempting to sue on its own behalf for a declaration of the rights of its potential clients (see, Matter of MFY Legal Servs. v. Dudley, 67 N.Y.2d 706, 708-709; Mixon v Grinker, 157 A.D.2d 423, 427). Certain exceptions to this general rule have been recognized for advocacy groups representing abused children (see, Grant v. Cuomo, 130 A.D.2d 154, affd 73 N.Y.2d 820), HIV-infected homeless persons (see, Mixon v. Grinker, 157 A.D.2d 423, supra), and Medicaid recipients (see, Community Serv. Socy. v. Cuomo, 167 A.D.2d 168). We do not find it appropriate to extend those limited exceptions to a case such as this which involves, inter alia, alleged personal injuries, breaches of private contractual relationships, and other personal claims (see, Henry v. Isaac, 214 A.D.2d 188) asserted against private, albeit heavily regulated, parties. Miller, J.P., Joy, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Henry v. Isaac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1996
228 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Henry v. Isaac

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD HENRY et al., Appellants, v. MORRIS ISAAC et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
645 N.Y.S.2d 48

Citing Cases

PELHAM COUNCIL v. Mt. Vernon

Consequently, organizational standing is not automatically granted merely upon a finding that the Dental…

Matter of Pelham Council v. City of Mount Vernon

Consequently, organizational standing is not automatically granted merely upon a finding that theDental…