From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. County of San Mateo

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 29, 2004
No. C 01-02345 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2004)

Opinion

No. C 01-02345 CRB

January 29, 2004


AMENDED JUDGMENT


The Court having granted summary judgment in favor of the County defendants on all claims except the County's vicarious liability for the Daytop defendants' negligence, having granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Moix on all claims, having granted summary judgment in favor of St. Mary's on all claims, having granted summary judgment in favor of the Datyop defendants on the federal claims, and having dismissed the remaining state law claims without prejudice, it is hereby ordered that judgment be entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff's.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Henry v. County of San Mateo

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 29, 2004
No. C 01-02345 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2004)
Case details for

Henry v. County of San Mateo

Case Details

Full title:VICKI HENRY, et al., Plaintiff's v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 29, 2004

Citations

No. C 01-02345 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2004)