From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 21, 2021
No. 2294-19 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2294-19

12-21-2021

Lacy M. Henry, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent


ORDER

Juan F. Vasquez, Judge

On September 10, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. Therein respondent states that petitioner Lacy M. Henry passed away after the petition in this case was filed and that he is unaware of any representative or fiduciary currently authorized to act on behalf of petitioner's estate. According to respondent, petitioner's ascertainable heirs at law are his surviving spouse Judy B. Henry and his surviving issue Meredith Wayne Henry.

Respondent requests that the Court find there are deficiencies in tax and additions to tax, as set forth in the notice of deficiency dated October 30, 2018, due from petitioner as follows:

Tax Year

Deficiency

Additions to Tax Sec. 6651(a)(1)

Sec. 6651(a)(2)

Sec. 6654

2009

$458,714

$103,210.65

$114,678.50

$10,982.75

2010

$414,721

$93,312.23

$103,680.25

$8,894.06

2011

$4,154

$934.65

$1,038.50

2012

$173,310

$38,994.75

$43,327.50

$3,107.14

2013

$3,960

$891.00

$990.00

2014

$6,959

$1,565.78

$124.85

2015

$14,627

$3,291.08

$263.45

2016

$1,355

$304.88

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion to dismiss is taken under advisement. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall, in addition to regular service upon the parties, serve copies of respondent's motion to dismiss and this Order upon Judy B. Henry and Meredith Wayne Henry at the addresses provided in respondent's motion to dismiss. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before January 14, 2022, respondent shall file, as a supplement to his motion to dismiss, a copy of petitioner's death certificate or a statement explaining, in detail, why he cannot obtain that document. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before January 31, 2022, any heir(s) at law of petitioner shall show cause, in writing, why respondent's motion to dismiss should not be granted and a decision entered determining there to be due from petitioner the above-described deficiencies and additions to tax for tax years 2009 through 2016.


Summaries of

Henry v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 21, 2021
No. 2294-19 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Henry v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Lacy M. Henry, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

No. 2294-19 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 21, 2021)