From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Capital One Bank (U.S.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 11, 2018
Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-2962-M (N.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-2962-M

09-11-2018

RAY HENRY, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver made Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants Moss Law Firm, P.C. and Michael A. Moss's Joint 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Statement of Amended Claim, Doc. 24, and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Doc. 26, are GRANTED.

Plaintiff's FDCPA claim and all defamation claims against Defendants Moss Law Firm, P.C. and Michael A. Moss, as well as defamation claims against Defendant Capital One premised on actions during the State Court Lawsuit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's FCRA claim against both Defendants and defamation claim against Capital One premised on the provision of information to the CRAs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a motion for leave to amend, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, by September 27, 2018. If Plaintiff fails to do so, said claims will be dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2018.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Henry v. Capital One Bank (U.S.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 11, 2018
Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-2962-M (N.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Henry v. Capital One Bank (U.S.)

Case Details

Full title:RAY HENRY, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 11, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-2962-M (N.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2018)

Citing Cases

Eustice v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

As Chase correctly explains, a credit furnisher like Chase would have a duty under § 1681s-2(b) only if…