From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HENNS v. MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. 5:11-cv-55-Oc-37TBS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:11-cv-55-Oc-37TBS.

September 19, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Defendant Mony Life Insurance Company of America's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Witnesses and Preclude Expert Testimony at Trial. (Doc. 42). In its Motion, Defendant seeks to strike as untimely Plaintiff's designation of Bill Hager as an expert witness and bar his testimony at trial. There is no dispute that Plaintiff disclosed Mr. Hager on August 2, 2011, after Plaintiff's expert disclosure deadline.

Pursuant to the Case Management Report, Plaintiff's expert disclosure deadline was July 1, 2011. (Doc. 14). The parties subsequently agreed to an extension of this deadline until July 15, 2011. (Doc. 42, Exhibit A).

In response, Plaintiff contends that if defense counsel had complied with Rule 3.01(g) and conferred with opposing counsel before filing the instant motion, he would have learned that Mr. Hager's disclosure was "not an official designation under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B)" and that he is a "rebuttal witness to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's expert if one is properly disclosed." (Doc. 43). According to Plaintiff, Mr Hager will provide expert testimony in support of Plaintiff's defenses to Defendant's counterclaim — and not in support of Plaintiff's case in chief.

After reading the Motion and response thereto, the Court is left to wonder why this Motion is pending before the Court. First, had defense counsel conferred with opposing counsel before filing the instant motion, they could have resolved this dispute without involving the Court. Counsel is reminded of their ongoing obligations under Local Rule 3.01(g). Second, assuming (as Plaintiff represents) that Mr. Hager is a rebuttal expert, it necessarily follows that he need not be disclosed unless and until Defendant discloses an expert witness. However, based on the record before the Court, it appears that Defendant has not designated any expert witnesses and its time for doing so has passed.

Pursuant to the parties' Case Management Report, Defendant's deadline for disclosure of expert reports was August 1, 2011. (Doc. 14). It appears, however, that the parties agreed to an extension of this deadline until August 15, 2011. (Doc. 42, Exhibit A).

Accordingly, Defendant Mony Life Insurance Company of America's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Witnesses and Preclude Expert Testimony at Trial. (Doc. 42) is due to be DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Ocala, Florida.


Summaries of

HENNS v. MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. 5:11-cv-55-Oc-37TBS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

HENNS v. MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Case Details

Full title:THERESA HENNS, Plaintiff, v. MONY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:11-cv-55-Oc-37TBS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 19, 2011)