From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henning v. Jesa Partnership

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 11, 2014
5:14-CV-00897-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2014)

Opinion

          LISA E. AGUIAR, RACHAEL E.B. BINDER, ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY, San Jose, CA, Attorneys for Defendant G&G LIQUORS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, dba F & W LIQUORS and GROCERIES.

          ABDALAH LAW OFFICES, RICHARD ABDALAH, Attorney for Defendant JESA, PARTNERSHIP, a California partnership.

          CREECH LIEBOW & KRAUS, EDWARD KRAUS, Attorney for Defendants ARMANDO M. DUENAS, an individual, and MARTIN MARTINEZ dba TAQUERIA EDUARDO.

          LAW OFFICE OF IRENE KARBELASHVILI, IRENE KARBELASHVILI, Attorney for Plaintiff RICHARD C HENNING.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXEND TIME TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES

          PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.

         Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant G&G LIQUORS. ("G&G Liquors"), Defendants ARMANDO M. DUENAS and MARTIN MARTINEZ, dba TAQUERIA EDUARDO ("Taqueria") and Plaintiff RICHARD C. HENNING ("Henning") and, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

         WHEREAS, pursuant to General Order No. 56 of the United States District Court

         Northern District of California, initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be completed no later than 7 days prior to the joint inspection and review required by ¶3;

         WHEREAS, all Parties have agreed that extending the time by which Parties have to exchange initial disclosures will promote productive settlement negotiations and conserve time and resources;

         WHEREAS, an additional 90 days to exchange FRCP 26(a) initial disclosures will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

         NOW, THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel, that all Parties shall have until September 8, 2014 to exchange initial disclosures as required by FRCP 26(a).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Irene Karbelashvili, Edward Kraus, and Richard Abdalah which shall serve in lieu of each of their respective signatures on the document.

          ORDER

         Pursuant to the above stipulation filed herein, and good cause appearing, Parties shall exchange FRCP 26(a) initial disclosures by September 8, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Henning v. Jesa Partnership

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 11, 2014
5:14-CV-00897-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Henning v. Jesa Partnership

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD C. HENNING, Plaintiff, v. JESA PARTNERSHIP, a California…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 11, 2014

Citations

5:14-CV-00897-PSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2014)