From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henning v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE
Sep 3, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-753-H (W.D. Ky. Sep. 3, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-753-H

09-03-2014

DEBRA L. HENNING PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff has filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security who denied her application for disability insurance. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge who concluded that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred as a matter of law and recommended reversing the Commissioner's decision and remanding this matter for further proceedings of functional limitations consistent with his opinion.

The Magistrate Judge concluded that "this is not one of the rare cases in which the medical evidence is so clear that the ALJ can use common sense to render a judgment about functional capacity." The Magistrate Judge concluded that Plaintiff's impairments were so many and varied that they required diagnosis by specialists because the resulting functional limitations were not intuitively obvious. The Commissioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as well as the objections to it. This matter presents a close case. Defendant notes that Plaintiff failed to make some of the arguments that the Magistrate Judge now cites. This does not matter. The Magistrate Judge has performed a comprehensive review and the Court will adopt his conclusions. A remand does appear to be necessary for the ALJ to obtain and consider the necessary professional assistance to interpret Plaintiff's medical records. In this particular case, the Court agrees that the ALJ is not qualified to interpret the raw clinical data and diagnose functional equivalents.

Being otherwise sufficiently advised,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

This is a final order.

September 3, 2014

/s/

John G. Heyburn II

Senior Judge, U.S. District Court
cc: Counsel of Record

Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer


Summaries of

Henning v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE
Sep 3, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-753-H (W.D. Ky. Sep. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Henning v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA L. HENNING PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE

Date published: Sep 3, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-753-H (W.D. Ky. Sep. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Jankowiak v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

An ALJ “is simply not qualified to interpret raw clinical data and diagnoses in functional terms.” Henning v.…

James F. v. Kijakazi

Lay persons are “simply not qualified to interpret raw medical data in functional terms ....” Wilson v.…