From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hennes v. Blitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1974
44 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

March 25, 1974


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, based upon defendant's having furnished plaintiff with an allegedly defective ladder (Labor Law, § 240), defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 24, 1973, in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability, upon a jury verdict, after a trial solely on that issue. Interlocutory judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed. The evidence produced by plaintiff failed to establish that the ladder supplied to him by defendant was defective. The proof was equally consistent with a possible finding that the condition of the cleat resulted from the fall of the ladder as it was with a possible finding that the condition of the cleat caused the fall. Thus, plaintiff failed to establish one of the requisite elements of his cause of action ( Kluttz v. Citron, 2 N.Y.2d 379, 383; see Digelormo v. Weil, 260 N.Y. 192, 200). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hennes v. Blitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1974
44 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Hennes v. Blitz

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT HENNES, Respondent, v. SAUL BLITZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1974

Citations

44 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Silva v. 81st Street Avenue a Corp.

Even if Mr. Silva actually fell from the ladder, his proof is devoid of any showing that this instrumentality…

Parsolano v. County of Nassau

Since Mr. Parsolano was the only person to have witnessed the accident, whether he fell from a ladder or any…