Opinion
December 14, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the plaintiff was entitled to enforce the child support provisions of the parties' separation agreement irrespective of the existence of certain Family Court orders subsequently obtained by the defendant directing him to pay lesser amounts of child support. The Family Court orders did not terminate the parties' rights and obligations set forth in their separation agreement (see, Kleila v Kleila, 50 N.Y.2d 277; Goldman v Goldman, 282 N.Y. 296; Donnelly v Matheson, 112 A.D.2d 341; Burtch v Burtch, 98 A.D.2d 704).
We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.