From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hennagan v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 24, 2011
No. CIV-S-11-1277 CMK (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-11-1277 CMK (TEMP) P.

May 24, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

DATED: May 23, 2011


Summaries of

Hennagan v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 24, 2011
No. CIV-S-11-1277 CMK (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Hennagan v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS LE'ROY HENNAGAN, JR., Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 24, 2011

Citations

No. CIV-S-11-1277 CMK (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. May. 24, 2011)