From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henick v. Mancini

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Apr 27, 1987
523 A.2d 1391 (Me. 1987)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1987.

Decided April 27, 1987.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Cumberland County.

Grover G. Alexander (orally), Gray, for plaintiffs.

Michael K. Crossen (orally), Jonathan S. Piper, Preti, Flaherty Beliveau, Portland, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal from the summary judgment for Charles Mancini entered by the Superior Court, Cumberland County, James J. and Maryann B. Henick contend that their claim for damages allegedly caused by Mancini's negligent operation of a snowplow in the scope of his employment with the State was filed within the six-year limitation set forth in 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (1980) and that the court erred in holding the action barred by the two-year limitation set forth in 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (1980). By an evenly divided court we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

Henick v. Mancini

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Apr 27, 1987
523 A.2d 1391 (Me. 1987)
Case details for

Henick v. Mancini

Case Details

Full title:James J. HENICK, et al. v. Charles MANCINI

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Apr 27, 1987

Citations

523 A.2d 1391 (Me. 1987)