From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HENG v. MAINE

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jun 23, 2011
Civil Action 7:08-CV-5 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:08-CV-5 (HL).

June 23, 2011


ORDER


On June 21, 2011, Defendants filed Motions to Sever, or in the Alternative, Motions for Separate Trials. (Docs. 116, 117, 118). Defendants Maine, Powers, Howell, Brown, Yancey, Schnake, and Riddall also filed a Motion to Bifurcate. (Doc. 116).

Defendants have stated their intent to file motions for summary judgment on the claims pending against them. The Court will defer ruling on the Motions to Sever and Motion to Bifurcate until after the summary judgment motions are ruled on. However, the parties are directed to complete briefing on the Motions to Sever and Motion to Bifurcate as provided under the Local Rules.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

HENG v. MAINE

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jun 23, 2011
Civil Action 7:08-CV-5 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2011)
Case details for

HENG v. MAINE

Case Details

Full title:PIP HENG, RONNY N. ASKEW, MICHAEL A. WALKER, and GEORGE C. HASKELL JR.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Jun 23, 2011

Citations

Civil Action 7:08-CV-5 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2011)