From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendrixson v. Frye

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 26, 2008
994 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 1D08-0209.

November 26, 2008.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. Jack R. Heflin, Judge.

Michele Frye Hendrixson, pro se, Appellant.

Stephen S. Poche, Shalimar, for Appellee.


We reverse the trial court's order to the extent it bars Appellant Michele Frye Hendrixson from filing any future pleadings not signed by a member in good standing with the Florida Bar because the trial court failed to give appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard before ordering the prohibition. See, e.g., Tasse v. Simpson, 842 So.2d 793, 796 (Fla. 2003); Lussy v. Fourth Dist. Court of Appeal, 828 So.2d 1026, 1026-27 (Fla. 2002); Jackson v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 790 So.2d 398, 399 (Fla. 2001); Johnson v. Wilbur, 981 So.2d 479, 480 (Fla, 1st DCA 2008); Favreau v. Favreau, 940 So.2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); see also State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48-49 (Fla. 1999) (recognizing that "denying a pro se litigant the opportunity to file future petitions is a serious sanction" and holding that "it is important for courts to first provide notice and an opportunity to respond" in order to protect the litigant's right of access to the courts and provide appellate courts' with "an enhanced ability to determine whether [any subsequent] denial of access is an appropriate sanction under the circumstances"). The order on appeal is affirmed otherwise.

BROWNING, C.J., WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hendrixson v. Frye

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 26, 2008
994 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Hendrixson v. Frye

Case Details

Full title:Michele Frye HENDRIXSON, Appellant v. Stephen George FRYE, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 26, 2008

Citations

994 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Pullins v. Britton

While a trial court has the authority to impose such a sanction where a litigant's avalanche of filings has…

Jones v. State

Appellant asserts, and the state concedes, that it was error for the trial court to order the prohibition…