Hendrix v. Gipson

Full title: MARCELL T. HENDRIX, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

CIV S-11-3399 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

MARCELL T. HENDRIX, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Defendant. No. CIV S-11-3399 CKD P. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 31, 2012.

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         On December 19, 2011, petitioner filed an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis. By an order filed December 23, 2011, petitioner was ordered to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On January 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a second application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, as with petitioner's first incomplete application, the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis application has not been filled out and signed by an authorized prison official. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Petitioner will be provided one final opportunity to submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The Clerk of the Court shall provide petitioner with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court; and

         2. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed in forma pauperis application. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.