From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendrix v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. CIV S-11-3399 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-3399 CKD P

01-10-2012

MARCELL T. HENDRIX, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Defendant.


ORDER

On December 19, 2011, petitioner filed an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis. By an order filed December 23, 2011, petitioner was ordered to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On January 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a second application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, as with petitioner's first incomplete application, the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis application has not been filled out and signed by an authorized prison official. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Petitioner will be provided one final opportunity to submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court shall provide petitioner with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court; and
2. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed in forma pauperis application. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hendrix v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. CIV S-11-3399 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Hendrix v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:MARCELL T. HENDRIX, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-3399 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)