From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendrickson v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2009
332 F. App'x 845 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1775.

Submitted: September 10, 2009.

Decided: September 14, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ).

John David Hendrickson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


John David Hendrickson appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) (2006) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrickson v. Walker, No. 1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hendrickson v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2009
332 F. App'x 845 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Hendrickson v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:John David HENDRICKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janelle Dawn WALKER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2009

Citations

332 F. App'x 845 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Peasley v. Lapeer Circuit Judge

The statute authorizing special questions contemplates that they shall be put in explanation or aid of a…

Moskin v. Goldstein

Should a question of fact be presented, it may be submitted to the jury and a verdict also rendered for the…